<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 vs Enterprise 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluethots.com/2008/05/15/web-20-vs-enterprise-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2008/05/15/web-20-vs-enterprise-20/</link>
	<description>Synergising People and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:37:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Lew</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2008/05/15/web-20-vs-enterprise-20/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=103#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Following your comment, I would rephrase my statement:

Enterprise 2.0 is the application of Web 2.0 technologies within an organisation (with some restrictions - maybe)

After reading your comment, I do think my statement at the start is quite silly. There are fundamental differences between E2 and W2. W2 being more focused on social and E2 more focus on collaboration (through the usage social elements / technologies) and withholding knowledge. I don&#039;t think I explain myself very well here. Let me write a post over the weekend to clarify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following your comment, I would rephrase my statement:</p>
<p>Enterprise 2.0 is the application of Web 2.0 technologies within an organisation (with some restrictions &#8211; maybe)</p>
<p>After reading your comment, I do think my statement at the start is quite silly. There are fundamental differences between E2 and W2. W2 being more focused on social and E2 more focus on collaboration (through the usage social elements / technologies) and withholding knowledge. I don&#8217;t think I explain myself very well here. Let me write a post over the weekend to clarify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2008/05/15/web-20-vs-enterprise-20/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=103#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I would be inclined to say that Web 2.0 represents tools used for social networking, and the process thereof; Enterprise 2.0 would represent utilizing Web 2.0 tools and processes within an internal organization.
E20 may require (justify?) the implementation of some restrictions on access or usage that would not likely be seen in the W20 environment - a seeming contradiction to the whole concept, but I don&#039;t believe so.  I see that as more of an adaptation feature.
Utilizing the same technology platform is exciting, and one way of blending positive aspects of both E20 and W20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be inclined to say that Web 2.0 represents tools used for social networking, and the process thereof; Enterprise 2.0 would represent utilizing Web 2.0 tools and processes within an internal organization.<br />
E20 may require (justify?) the implementation of some restrictions on access or usage that would not likely be seen in the W20 environment &#8211; a seeming contradiction to the whole concept, but I don&#8217;t believe so.  I see that as more of an adaptation feature.<br />
Utilizing the same technology platform is exciting, and one way of blending positive aspects of both E20 and W20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

