<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The true cost and savings of Enterprise 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluethots.com/2009/05/14/the-true-cost-and-savings-of-enterprise-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2009/05/14/the-true-cost-and-savings-of-enterprise-20/</link>
	<description>Synergising People and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:37:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Lew</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2009/05/14/the-true-cost-and-savings-of-enterprise-20/comment-page-1/#comment-9545</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=488#comment-9545</guid>
		<description>Haha! Mate this is what I am doing for my thesis.. Will tell you the answer in a few years. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! Mate this is what I am doing for my thesis.. Will tell you the answer in a few years. <img src='http://www.bluethots.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2009/05/14/the-true-cost-and-savings-of-enterprise-20/comment-page-1/#comment-9437</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=488#comment-9437</guid>
		<description>Good Article. 

The question is whether Enterprise 2.0 can fit within the standard project evaluation model used by corporations in decision making. Ultimately if the project do not translate into dollar values to the shareholder (cost savings or increased sales revenues in the form of future cash flows), it may not be in the firm&#039;s interest to pursue further.

Should a new project evaluation framework be created for projects that returns soft (intangible) benefits ? How measurable are they ? Does Enterprise 2.0&#039;s uniqueness deserve a separate model on its own ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Article. </p>
<p>The question is whether Enterprise 2.0 can fit within the standard project evaluation model used by corporations in decision making. Ultimately if the project do not translate into dollar values to the shareholder (cost savings or increased sales revenues in the form of future cash flows), it may not be in the firm&#8217;s interest to pursue further.</p>
<p>Should a new project evaluation framework be created for projects that returns soft (intangible) benefits ? How measurable are they ? Does Enterprise 2.0&#8242;s uniqueness deserve a separate model on its own ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

