<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blue Sky Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluethots.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluethots.com</link>
	<description>Synergising People and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:37:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About me by Ranjith Nayar</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/about-me/comment-page-1/#comment-92916</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjith Nayar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?page_id=397#comment-92916</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean,

I was pleasantly surprised to stumble across your blog. Surprised, because I share almost the same interests as you - management consulting, innovation management, IT enablers of innovation - specifically Web2 and Web3. I live in Singapore and am registered for my PhD in which I am working on the impact of Web3 on leadership and innovation. Would be interesting to share thoughts with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,</p>
<p>I was pleasantly surprised to stumble across your blog. Surprised, because I share almost the same interests as you &#8211; management consulting, innovation management, IT enablers of innovation &#8211; specifically Web2 and Web3. I live in Singapore and am registered for my PhD in which I am working on the impact of Web3 on leadership and innovation. Would be interesting to share thoughts with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The returns and costs of collaboration by Nick Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2009/11/05/the-costs-of-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-91906</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 04:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=593#comment-91906</guid>
		<description>I think your article says precisely nothing. Yes, collaboration costs - that much is self evident. Breathing also costs, as does thinking, talking, writing doing and a few other things. 

The real question, and one which you don&#039;t even attempt to answer, is whether the benefits outweight the costs for the majority of teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your article says precisely nothing. Yes, collaboration costs &#8211; that much is self evident. Breathing also costs, as does thinking, talking, writing doing and a few other things. </p>
<p>The real question, and one which you don&#8217;t even attempt to answer, is whether the benefits outweight the costs for the majority of teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enterprise 2.0 Change Management by Let’s share! &#171; MarkjOwen&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2008/09/15/enterprise-20-change-management/comment-page-1/#comment-83833</link>
		<dc:creator>Let’s share! &#171; MarkjOwen&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=203#comment-83833</guid>
		<description>[...] Enterprise 2.0 Change Management &#8221; Blue Sky Thinking (bluethots.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enterprise 2.0 Change Management &#8221; Blue Sky Thinking (bluethots.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enterprise 2.0 Change Management by Change Management Senior Consultant &#8211; Towers Watson &#171; Executive Leadership, LLC &#8211; Career Opportunities</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2008/09/15/enterprise-20-change-management/comment-page-1/#comment-82202</link>
		<dc:creator>Change Management Senior Consultant &#8211; Towers Watson &#171; Executive Leadership, LLC &#8211; Career Opportunities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=203#comment-82202</guid>
		<description>[...] Enterprise 2.0 Change Management &#8221; Blue Sky Thinking (bluethots.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enterprise 2.0 Change Management &#8221; Blue Sky Thinking (bluethots.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can Enterprise 2.0 provide sustainable competitive advantage? by Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2008/06/28/can-enterprise-20-provide-sustainable-competitive-advantage/comment-page-1/#comment-75952</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 15:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=148#comment-75952</guid>
		<description>Marvelous! Superior performance outcomes and superiority in production resources reflects competitive advantage. I recently read an interesting post by Codebaby about “Your Competitive Advantage Is Your Customers Buying Experience” http://codebaby.com/cbBlog/2011/04/26/competitive-advantage-customers-buying-experience/ that I thought you would find interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvelous! Superior performance outcomes and superiority in production resources reflects competitive advantage. I recently read an interesting post by Codebaby about “Your Competitive Advantage Is Your Customers Buying Experience” <a href="http://codebaby.com/cbBlog/2011/04/26/competitive-advantage-customers-buying-experience/" rel="nofollow">http://codebaby.com/cbBlog/2011/04/26/competitive-advantage-customers-buying-experience/</a> that I thought you would find interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web 2.0 going bonkers?? by Jahlin</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2007/12/05/web-20-going-bonkers/comment-page-1/#comment-75045</link>
		<dc:creator>Jahlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 13:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluethots.com/?p=14#comment-75045</guid>
		<description>Tankhs for the insight. It brings light into the dark!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tankhs for the insight. It brings light into the dark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Business intelligence and in-memory analytics by A BI guy</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2010/12/21/business-intelligence-and-in-memory-analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-73414</link>
		<dc:creator>A BI guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=615#comment-73414</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean,
I think I know where you are coming from, but also think you&#039;re a bit misguided.

There are fundamental differences between what a Data Warehouse is for and an Operational Data Store. Additionally throw in there a tool such as TM1 (the in-memory analytics you&#039;re talking about)and you&#039;ve got different tools for different jobs.

Suggest you read some text from Inmon or alike on what:
a) Business Intelligence is
b) What the differences (and overlaps) are between Operational Reporting, BI and Corporate Performance Management 
c) Characteristics of a DW etc (i.e. slow changing dimensions)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,<br />
I think I know where you are coming from, but also think you&#8217;re a bit misguided.</p>
<p>There are fundamental differences between what a Data Warehouse is for and an Operational Data Store. Additionally throw in there a tool such as TM1 (the in-memory analytics you&#8217;re talking about)and you&#8217;ve got different tools for different jobs.</p>
<p>Suggest you read some text from Inmon or alike on what:<br />
a) Business Intelligence is<br />
b) What the differences (and overlaps) are between Operational Reporting, BI and Corporate Performance Management<br />
c) Characteristics of a DW etc (i.e. slow changing dimensions)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Active and passive collaboration by moses lew</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2011/02/25/active-and-passive-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-70996</link>
		<dc:creator>moses lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=624#comment-70996</guid>
		<description>active - higher levels of disinformation such as blogs, &quot;a lot of information&quot; = a lot of disinformation. as it is published by people who might not necessary be the subject matter experts. 

passive - a state of highly dependable information, but most channels are still placing a price on such forms of information because they carry weight and solves a targeted problem. 

honestly, passive or active does not matter. what i feel needs to be explored is the motivation behind each person&#039;s contribution of information. align the motivations and develop quick and easy channels for them to collaborate. 

people naturally group together based on motivations. an example might be &quot;if u love bicycles, you need to check out this website&quot; and when a person logs into the website and finds people who share similar motivations, they subtly start contributing and following (which then, RSS feeds become relevant). 

hence, we can tell that motivation is important, and hence, if u wanna know if active or passive is more effective, explore the motivation. 

when u are sick, you are motivated to get well faster, and hence, a passive collaboration is more effective. however, when you are motivated by a certain sport / movie star, you will find every bit of juicy information on every other blog about it. 

my two cents =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>active &#8211; higher levels of disinformation such as blogs, &#8220;a lot of information&#8221; = a lot of disinformation. as it is published by people who might not necessary be the subject matter experts. </p>
<p>passive &#8211; a state of highly dependable information, but most channels are still placing a price on such forms of information because they carry weight and solves a targeted problem. </p>
<p>honestly, passive or active does not matter. what i feel needs to be explored is the motivation behind each person&#8217;s contribution of information. align the motivations and develop quick and easy channels for them to collaborate. </p>
<p>people naturally group together based on motivations. an example might be &#8220;if u love bicycles, you need to check out this website&#8221; and when a person logs into the website and finds people who share similar motivations, they subtly start contributing and following (which then, RSS feeds become relevant). </p>
<p>hence, we can tell that motivation is important, and hence, if u wanna know if active or passive is more effective, explore the motivation. </p>
<p>when u are sick, you are motivated to get well faster, and hence, a passive collaboration is more effective. however, when you are motivated by a certain sport / movie star, you will find every bit of juicy information on every other blog about it. </p>
<p>my two cents =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Different Types of Web 2.0 by Justin Neo</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2009/02/03/the-different-meanings-of-web-20/comment-page-1/#comment-69253</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=342#comment-69253</guid>
		<description>Hello all! I would like to know what are the different types of web 2.0 in organisation?..
What are the Use of Web 2.0 Capabilities by organisation?..
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all! I would like to know what are the different types of web 2.0 in organisation?..<br />
What are the Use of Web 2.0 Capabilities by organisation?..<br />
 <img src='http://www.bluethots.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analysis on GST for online purchases by Sean Lew</title>
		<link>http://www.bluethots.com/2011/01/06/analysis-on-gst-for-online-purchases/comment-page-1/#comment-66889</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluethots.com/?p=617#comment-66889</guid>
		<description>@Eric, you have an interesting perspective the re the dropshipper / white labeling. I do see some issues like branding, support and warrant but that requires more investigation. 

@Matt, nice to hear from you. Hope you had a good break. I am with you on this. I really do hope that Australia people and government doesn&#039;t get sucked in. I have bought most of my stuff last year online and that includes stuff like business suits and couches. 

Retailers need to improve efficiency, marketing effectiveness, reduce costs and have effective campaigns. They talk about buying overseas is un-Australian. But if Australia is not competitive in the global market, there will not be a Australia to be un-Australian in future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric, you have an interesting perspective the re the dropshipper / white labeling. I do see some issues like branding, support and warrant but that requires more investigation. </p>
<p>@Matt, nice to hear from you. Hope you had a good break. I am with you on this. I really do hope that Australia people and government doesn&#8217;t get sucked in. I have bought most of my stuff last year online and that includes stuff like business suits and couches. </p>
<p>Retailers need to improve efficiency, marketing effectiveness, reduce costs and have effective campaigns. They talk about buying overseas is un-Australian. But if Australia is not competitive in the global market, there will not be a Australia to be un-Australian in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

